All States
Wholesaling law on the booksLast reviewed 2026-07-08
Read the official statute
Public Act 101-0357 (2019), amending the Real Estate License Act of 2000, codified at 225 ILCS 454

Illinois Wholesaling Law: Real Estate License Act (Public Act 101-0357)

State: Illinois
Bill: Public Act 101-0357 (2019), amending the Real Estate License Act of 2000, codified at 225 ILCS 454
Effective date: August 9, 2019 (Public Act 101-0357, Section 99: "This Act takes effect upon becoming law," signed 8-9-2019). In force for years, no phase-in left to plan around
Applies to: Anyone who engages in a "pattern of business" of dealing in real estate contracts, assignable contracts, or options for compensation (225 ILCS 454/1-10(5)). No property-type carve-out, so land and commercial contracts are covered
Bottom line: You get one wholesale deal per rolling 12 months without a license. Deal number two inside that window makes you an unlicensed broker, exposed to a fine of up to $25,000 per violation and (per a third-party report) a criminal misdemeanor. To scale here, get an Illinois broker license or double close as a true principal.


What the Law Says (Plain English)

Illinois was the first state to regulate wholesaling, and it did it through the licensing door rather than a disclosure-and-wait scheme.

The one-deal rule: An unlicensed person may do exactly one wholesale-type transaction in any rolling 12-month period. The statute makes you a "broker" if you "engage in a pattern of business of buying, selling, offering to buy or sell, marketing for sale, exchanging, or otherwise dealing in contracts, including assignable contracts for the purchase or sale of, or options on real estate" (225 ILCS 454/1-10(5)). It then defines "pattern of business" as engaging in one or more of those practices "on 2 or more occasions in any 12-month period." So one occasional deal is not a pattern; the second qualifying deal inside 12 months is, and it requires an active Illinois broker license. There is no separate "one free deal" exemption in the exemptions section (5-20); the single-deal allowance is simply a byproduct of that 2-or-more threshold. Note the window is rolling, not a calendar year: a deal in October and a deal the following March are both inside one 12-month window.

What counts as a wholesale-type transaction: Illinois reads brokerage activity broadly. Per the sources it includes: assigning a contract for compensation, taking finder's or referral fees, earning a fee or profit for facilitating a transaction for another, and acting as an intermediary between buyer and seller. Compensation is read broadly too, including assignment fees and transaction-based profit where the activity looks like brokerage.

Marketing restriction: Per the Chico report, publicly advertising assignable contracts (online listings, flyers, social media posts) is prohibited without a license. Quietly presenting a deal to a private, pre-identified buyer list is treated as lower risk, but it is a gray area, not a safe harbor.

Disclosure duties (attributed, not in the fetched statute text): A third-party report says wholesalers must disclose their equitable interest (the legal stake you get in a property by signing a purchase contract, before you own it) to sellers, inform them of their right to seek an independent appraisal and legal advice, and disclose income from the transaction. This does not appear in the sections we pulled (1-10, 5-20, 20-20), so treat it as a best practice to verify, not a confirmed statutory mandate.

If you get licensed: You take on the full brokerage compliance stack: agency disclosure, compensation disclosure, compliant contracts, and brokerage supervision.


What You CANNOT Do

What You CAN Still Do


The Loopholes

Loophole #1: The One Free Deal

The trigger is doing MORE than one wholesale-type transaction in 12 months. One assignment per rolling 12-month window is expressly allowed without a license. Clean. Good for a part-timer or for testing the market, useless for a volume business. Track your window carefully: it rolls, it does not reset on January 1. And do not try to multiply the allowance with entities you control (see Loophole #5).

Loophole #2: Double Close as a True Principal

The trigger words are dealing in "contracts, including assignable contracts ... or options on real estate." If you fund the purchase, take title, and then resell the property, you are dealing in real estate as an owner, not dealing in contracts. The Act's owner/lessor exemption confirms this: the license requirement does not apply to "the owner or lessor of real property who performs any of the acts described in the definition of 'broker' ... only as it relates to the owned or leased property" (225 ILCS 454/5-20(1)(A)). Clean on the deal structure itself, with two caveats:

Loophole #3: Get Licensed (The Volume Path)

The statute's own answer. With an active Illinois broker license, the one-deal cap disappears. Clean. The friction: coursework, the broker exam, annual renewals, sponsorship/supervision requirements, and full brokerage compliance on every deal (agency disclosure, compensation disclosure, compliant contracts). One wrinkle to resolve with an attorney first: the Google report says licensed firms and subagents cannot wholesale on behalf of clients, so map out the line between wholesaling your own deals as a principal and doing it for others before you build the model.

Loophole #4: Private Marketing to a Known Buyer List

Per the Chico report, the public-advertising restriction targets public platforms, and presenting a deal quietly to a pre-identified private investor group is less likely to draw scrutiny. Gray. The source itself calls it a gray area, it is single-sourced, and it does not fix the one-deal count problem; it only lowers your marketing profile. Litigation bait if you lean on it at volume. Talk to an Illinois attorney.

Loophole #5: Entity Splitting to Multiply the Deal Count (Closed)

Running deal two through a second LLC you control. This does not work, because the statute closes it by name. The "pattern of business" definition counts activity done "by itself or with any combination of other individuals or entities, whether as partners or common owners in another entity" (225 ILCS 454/1-10(5)). The Act aggregates every deal across the entities you commonly own, so two LLCs you control still add up to two occasions in 12 months. Closed. Not available.

Not a Loophole Here: Vacant Land and Commercial

In disclosure-model states like Missouri, land and commercial deals escape because the statute only covers 1-4 unit residential. Illinois has no such limit. The Act regulates dealing in "contracts, including assignable contracts ... or options on real estate," with no property-type carve-out, so a land or commercial assignment counts toward your one deal just like a house does.


Penalties If You Violate It


Related Rules in the Same Act


Quick Reference

StrategyCovered by the law?Key requirement
One assignment in a rolling 12 monthsAllowed unlicensedTrack the rolling window
Two or more assignments in 12 monthsYesActive Illinois broker license
Publicly advertising an assignable contractYesLicense required
Private marketing to known buyersGrayAttorney review; does not fix the deal count
Double close as principal (take title)Outside (owner exemption, 5-20(1)(A))Fund and close; no public pre-title marketing
Vacant land / commercial assignmentCovered (no carve-out)Same one-deal rule
Finder's / referral fees, middleman for a feeYesLicense required if repeated
Entity splitting to add dealsClosed (statute aggregates commonly-owned entities)Not available

This summary is an analysis of Public Act 101-0357 and the codified Real Estate License Act (225 ILCS 454), supplemented by secondhand reporting for the items flagged as attributed, not legal advice. Confirm your deal structure with an Illinois real estate attorney, especially double closing mechanics and anything involving a license.

Sources: enacted text of Public Act 101-0357 (Section 99) and codified 225 ILCS 454/1-10, 5-20, and 20-20 (on file); Google deep research report, Illinois section (strict broker licensure states); Chico report 1.2, Illinois section; a third-party industry report, Illinois section. The criminal-misdemeanor and seller-disclosure items are attributed to the reports and were not in the pulled statute sections.

We are not attorneys and this is not legal advice.
These summaries are our reading of the bills and public reporting. Laws change fast and we may have something wrong or out of date. Always confirm with a real estate attorney licensed in your state before structuring a deal. Spot an inaccuracy? Tell us in the Skool community and we will fix it.